Politics and Ethics of Assam Riots
The communities of North East India (NEI) are fleeing from their
respective work and living places with clueless and anxious faces in jam-
packed special exodus trains. They had moved over to the other parts of India
for education and employment. The NEI communities have been under apathy and
discrimination by the mainland Indian politicians. The NEI region is still
found underdeveloped in the midst of rich natural resources, challenged by
insurgency as response to political pressure. There have been cross border
infiltration by the citizens of the neighboring countries.
The mass exodus is a fall-out of the recent violence in Assam. This particular violence was between the
Bodos (a native tribal community) and the infiltrated communities and recent
settlers who marginalize the rest of the local ethnic communities. Media
reported that the violence took 77+ lives and damaged several crores worth of
property that triggered panic, insecurity and mistrust among the communities.
Around 400 rescue camps were set all over Assam for over 5,00,000 people.
Interestingly, for a few days even the aid agencies were suspected and were not
allowed to serve the tarnished communities with food, water and medicine.
It is unfortunate that some of the “mainland’ political parties
and media interpreted this violent event as ‘communal’ and as if it were
between two communal or religious groups. They started playing a ‘blame game’
between political parties. For the State and those political parties the
victims of the riot are ‘vote bank’. So, they play a mild and balanced role to
satisfy both groups and treated this as a ‘law and order’ issue.
This violence is multifaceted: it is about ethnicity, identity,
border, land and resources, exclusion, political power, economic, development,
minorities, and electoral politics issues. The living space of the ‘Bodos’ and
local ethnic communities are shrinking every day due to settlements by the infiltrators
from neighboring country. It is a policy issue of the State(s).
Obviously, such unethical and irresponsible behaviors of the
political parties result in greater harm and left a scar on the nation and its
unity, on people trusting the State machineries for protection of life. Its
failure would lead to more incidents as Assam. Amending and executing the
constitution and policies of the State on this issue would have been more
appropriate. But the State looks at itself as a political party and fail to
respond to peoples aspirations. When people lose their confidence in the State
they respond on their own style. The agitation could be seen as against the
State and its policies too. But, the basic ethic of any state is to win the
confidence of people and work for their welfare. Even after several assuring
statements from the Prime Minster, respective Chief Ministers and other
Community leaders, the NEI communities started fleeing towards their homelands
for their safety.
The State machinery may be efficient in handling the post-conflict
situation effectively but not the pre-conflict situation. So, it the time for
States to re-organize their mechanisms to give confidence to the people who are
in panic situations as beforehand responses.
There is another possible reason for the NEI communities not having trust in the Government. But they have
been discriminated and treated as second class citizens. A structured and
perpetuated hate campaign is initiated by the right wing fundamentalists.
Several young girls were sexually abused and several are attacked, some to
death. The local police and administration did not identify themselves with
them to assure their safe stay. They were called and addressed as ‘chingies’
and ‘junglies’. The society at large has not given enough attention and considered
them as they are part of us and our country.
It is interesting to observe a political shift among the right
wing groups. They initiated the massive hate campaigns and later became the
saviours of the NEI by distributing food and water to the fleeing communities
while they are on trains. They even floated the idea that a foreign agent
triggered the issue. Actually most of the attacks on NEI were carried out by
the Indian right wing ideologists. It is a classical example of political
opportunism.
Political parties should also take responsibility for such chaos
and confusion. Reclaiming confidence should be the prime motive of any
political party. Now they have gone to the level of blaming a foreign hand on
the issue. This may help the ruling parties to silence opposition parties
blaming them on any issue but this would not solve the problem at all. The
States and the political parties have to come together and work on a common
agenda of Unity of the Nation by forgetting their differences.
This issue and the nature of such violence have to be differently
viewed and addressed. Initially the Law and Order approach would help the state
to bring normalcy; but for the future course the states and political parties
would jointly involve in solving the problems and find mutual and consensual
solutions between the groups that are in conflict and fight for their cause.
Priorities could be set to solve the problems politically and socially than
through arms.
The role of media needs a greater attention. In many cases instead
calming the issue, sensational reporting creates unnecessary panic and fear
among the people. It has caused distrust among communities at large.
It is the duty of the entire human community and peace-lovers to
work together in handling the issues. The NGOs and People’s groups, Civil
Society Movement should be together to work on Peace and Development. A
long-term peace should be the vision. It is time for us to design our
development programmes that integrate and inbuilt peace and harmony into (y)our
developmental programmes. The resource sharing partners should emphasize on
this. As we involve in interfaith and inter religious dialogue let us promote the
inter-tribal and inter-ethnic groups dialogue. Facilitate them to accept and
understand each other as they are instead just working on economically
self-reliant.
All Faith Based Communities (FBOs) should check aggressive
proselytitation campaigns and turn them into campaign for inter-tribal or
inter-ethnic groups dialogue. Facilitating such dialogue should be the mission
agenda of every faith groups of those regions.
One cannot either ignore or sideline the role of the public and
civil society. The entire community should see any conflict as (y)our issue
since we are part of these conflicts. We may not directly involve in them but
our presence should be felt at large. Every citizen should have a breath of
peace and unity. So, let us together inculcate the culture of peace and harmony
in the society at large.
Finally it needs a concerted effort of the State, political
parties, organs, FBOs, NGOs and Civil Society groups and people to address
issues related to peace and harmony in the society. None of the single organ
can achieve this alone. This particular issue may be due to migrants and settlers. Help the State
to come-up with a strong, relevant and practical policies on infiltration,
migration, land, natural resources, livelihood and related issues identified
locally. Be a watchdog and force the State to implement them appropriately without
any bias. Make the State to lawfully and morally commit to such policies.
Unless all are together, the divisive forces whether it is
internal or external will take over the issue and achieve what they want. Let
all us forget our indifferences and be together for Unity, Peace and Harmony.
Your points are very reflective Christopher. It should challenge us to be an agent of change in the face of fleeting rumors and political subterfuge. Keep challenging your passive readers with your theological reflections!
ReplyDeleteKasta